1. Jan Dibbets: ‘Perspective Correction’ (1968)

    Reminds me of my photographic ‘quadrat’ studies of the concrete grid and moss path…





  5. Rosalind Krauss: ‘Grids’



    Rosalind Krauss

    October. Vol. 9

    pp 50-64


    In the early part of this century there began to appear, first in France and then in Russia and in Holland, a structure that has remained emblematic of the modernist ambition within the visual arts ever since. Surfacing in pre-War cubist painting and subsequently becoming ever more stringent and manifest, the grid announces, among other things, modern art’s will to silence, its hostility to literature, to narrative, to discourse. As such, the grid has done its job with striking efficiency. The barrier it has lowered between the arts of vision and those of language has been almost totally successful in walling the visual arts into a realm of exclusive visuality and defending them against the intrusion of speech. The arts, of course, have paid dearly for this success, because the fortress they constructed on the foundation of the grid has increasingly become a ghetto. Fewer and fewer voices from the general critical establishment have been raised in support, appreciation, or analysis of the contemporary plastic arts.

    Yet it is safe to say that no form within the whole of modern aesthetic production has sustained itself so relentlessly while at the same time being so impervious to change. It is not just the sheer number of careers that have been devoted to the exploration of the grid that is impressive, but the fact that never could exploration have chosen less fertile ground. As the experience of Mondrian amply demonstrates, development is precisely what the grid resists. But no one seems to have been deterred by that example, and modernist practice continues to generate ever more instances of grids.

    There are two ways in which the grid functions to declare the modernity of modern art. One is spatial; the other is temporal. In the spatial sense, the grid states the autonomy of the realm of art. Flattened, geometricized, ordered, it is antinatural, antimimetic, antireal. It is what art looks like when it turns its back on nature. In the flatness that results from its coordinates, the grid is the means of crowding out the dimensions of the real and replacing them with the lateral spread of a single surface. In the overall regularity of its organization, it is the result not of imitation, but of aesthetic decree. Insofar as its order is that of pure relationship, the grid is a way of abrogating the claims of natural objects to have an order particular to themselves; the relationships in the aesthetic field are shown by the grid to be in a world apart and, with respect to natural objects, to be both prior and final. The grid declares the space of art to be at once autonomous and autotelic.

    Read More


  6. Hospital spaces (work-in-progress)


  7. All about gardens, parks and paths…

    Prepping work for my upcoming show at Bond House gallery later in the month with artists Michaela Nettell and Nicholas Cheeseman Thank goodness I’ve a looong corridor!



    Playing with containment and rupture within the frame


  9. In the studio working on collages, and reflecting…

    "Window glass alienates "subject" from "object". From behind the glass, the spectator’s view is "objective" while the observed’s subject(ivity) is concealed. The observer on the outside of the glass cannot be part of an interior group’s “intersubjective” framework. Being mirror reflective glass, glass reflects the mirror image of an observer, as well as the particular inside or outside world behind him, into the image of the space into which he is looking. Abstractly, this reflectiveness of glass allows it to be a sign signifying, at the same time, the nature of the opposition between the two spaces and their common mediation”. Dan Graham